<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>AI &amp;mdash; Noisy Deadlines</title>
    <link>https://noisydeadlines.net/tag:AI</link>
    <description>&#34;I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.&#34; - Douglas Adams</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 03:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>A few strong opinions about AI</title>
      <link>https://noisydeadlines.net/a-few-strong-opinions-about-ai?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[I’ve been thinking about AI for a while now, since I am increasingly being surrounded by AI tools at work, with Microsoft adding a Copilot button everywhere I look. But that’s a topic for another time.&#xA;&#xA;What inspired me to write here was the recent controversy within the Blaugust community about the use of AI-generated images and text. And I knew about this controversy after reading Andreas’ post: Are we becoming too paranoid about AI slop? And then the contribution to the topic by Joel: Not paranoid, but respectful.&#xA;&#xA;I read the Blaugust Statement “Use of AI as a Blaugust Participant” and I found it made total sense, allowing AI assistance but not using it to substantially generate text. I believe most bloggers cherish the writing craft: having an idea, a thought, an emotion and putting it all into words for other human beings to read. &#xA;&#xA;I occasionally will use AI to “proofread” a text that I wrote to catch grammar and vocabulary mistakes, since English is not my native language. Other than that, I avoid using AI chatbots. I don’t like chatting with them. And that’s just me, I think the systemic harms these tools are causing to our society greatly outweigh the benefits right now.&#xA;&#xA;It seems the real Blaugust controversy was about the use of generative AI images. The Blaugust Statement actually accepts the use of some AI-generated images:&#xA;&#xA;  An AI-generated image accompanying a human-written article is acceptable; a post whose only substantive creative element is an AI-generated image would not meet the spirit of the event.&#xA;&#xA;And that’s okay, since the main work is focused on the text, not on the image itself.&#xA;&#xA;Now some strong opinions.&#xA;&#xA;As of today, I don’t consider that AI-generated images with the use of prompts are human art. Or craftsmanship. Or anything that can be considered art by human standards. There is no soul behind it; there is no human brain that made big or small deliberate choices to craft that image. It’s like using a slot machine to randomly generate something. Can that be considered an artistic choice?&#xA;&#xA;Maybe these artifacts will become something different in the future, but today I feel that AI-generated content, be it image or text, is slop. I don’t like it when I see it; I can recognize this uncanny feel to it, and I basically avoid it at all costs.&#xA;&#xA;And that’s just my personal stand at the moment. I have the power to choose what I consume online, and I just stay away from places or services that “serve” this type of content.&#xA;&#xA;—&#xA;&#xA;Note: I didn’t have time to proofread this with an AI tool before posting, so all mistakes are my own.&#xA;&#xA;Post 03 of #Blaugust #NoisyMusings #AI&#xA;&#xA;Thoughts? a href=&#34;https://remark.as/p/noisydeadlines.net/a-few-strong-opinions-about-ai&#34;Discuss.../a if you have a Write.as account or Reply by email&#xD;&#xA;-------&#xD;&#xA;By Noisy Deadlines&#xD;&#xA;Minimalist in progress, nerdy, introvert, skeptic. I don&#39;t leave without my e-reader.&#xD;&#xA;]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been thinking about AI for a while now, since I am increasingly being surrounded by AI tools at work, with Microsoft adding a Copilot button everywhere I look. But that’s a topic for another time.</p>

<p>What inspired me to write here was the recent controversy within the Blaugust community about the use of AI-generated images and text. And I knew about this controversy after reading Andreas’ post: <strong><a href="https://82mhz.net/posts/2026/08/are-we-becoming-too-paranoid-about-ai-slop/">Are we becoming too paranoid about AI slop? </a></strong>And then the contribution to the topic by Joel: <strong><a href="https://joelchrono.xyz/blog/not-paranoid-but-respectful/">Not paranoid, but respectful</a></strong>.</p>

<p>I read the Blaugust Statement <strong><a href="https://nerdgirlthoughts.game.blog/2026/07/15/blaugust-2026-is-coming/">“Use of AI as a Blaugust Participant”</a></strong> and I found it made total sense, allowing AI assistance but not using it to substantially generate text. I believe most bloggers cherish the writing craft: having an idea, a thought, an emotion and putting it all into words for other human beings to read.</p>

<p>I occasionally will use AI to “proofread” a text that I wrote to catch grammar and vocabulary mistakes, since English is not my native language. Other than that, I avoid using AI chatbots. I don’t like chatting with them. And that’s just me, <strong>I think the systemic harms these tools are causing to our society greatly outweigh the benefits right now.</strong></p>

<p>It seems the real Blaugust controversy was about the use of generative AI images. The <a href="https://nerdgirlthoughts.game.blog/2026/07/15/blaugust-2026-is-coming/">Blaugust Statement</a> actually accepts the use of some AI-generated images:</p>

<blockquote><p>An AI-generated image accompanying a human-written article is acceptable; a post whose only substantive creative element is an AI-generated image would not meet the spirit of the event.</p></blockquote>

<p>And that’s okay, since the main work is focused on the text, not on the image itself.</p>

<p><strong>Now some strong opinions.</strong></p>

<p>As of today, I don’t consider that AI-generated images with the use of prompts are human art. Or craftsmanship. Or anything that can be considered art by human standards. There is no soul behind it; there is no human brain that made big or small deliberate choices to craft that image. It’s like using a slot machine to randomly generate something. Can that be considered an artistic choice?</p>

<p>Maybe these artifacts will become something different in the future, but today I feel that AI-generated content, be it image or text, is slop. I don’t like it when I see it; I can recognize this uncanny feel to it, and I basically avoid it at all costs.</p>

<p>And that’s just my personal stand at the moment. I have the power to choose what I consume online, and I just stay away from places or services that “serve” this type of content.</p>

<p>—</p>

<p><em>Note: I didn’t have time to proofread this with an AI tool before posting, so all mistakes are my own.</em></p>

<p>Post 03 of <a href="https://noisydeadlines.net/tag:Blaugust"><a href="https://noisydeadlines.net/tag:Blaugust" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Blaugust</span></a></a> <a href="https://write.as/noisydeadlines/tag:noisymusings"><a href="https://noisydeadlines.net/tag:NoisyMusings" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">NoisyMusings</span></a></a> <a href="https://noisydeadlines.net/tag:AI" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">AI</span></a></p>

<p>Thoughts? <a href="https://remark.as/p/noisydeadlines.net/a-few-strong-opinions-about-ai">Discuss...</a> if you have a Write.as account or <a href="mailto:noisydeadlines@fastmail.com?subject=Reply%20to%20blog%20post">Reply by email</a></p>

<hr/>

<p><strong><a href="https://noisydeadlines.net/about">By Noisy Deadlines</a></strong>
<em>Minimalist in progress, nerdy, introvert, skeptic. I don&#39;t leave without my e-reader.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://noisydeadlines.net/a-few-strong-opinions-about-ai</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 01:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>